Why Current Sets exists
Our goal since the beginning has been simple to state and hard to do: review work in this industry is roughly 90% manual and 10% automated. We think that ratio should be flipped. Not by replacing expert judgment, but by stripping out the manual busywork around it, so the person who knows what a good corridor detail looks like spends their time applying that judgment instead of re-checking dimensions by hand across two hundred sheets.
That focus turned into a cross-discipline overlay engine and a revision-comparison tool that powers both a full-service constructability review and a platform teams can run themselves. It's deliberately not a PDF markup tool, not a project-management system, not a BIM platform, and not a code-compliance checker. It does one thing: compares what's actually on the drawings, across disciplines and across revisions, and surfaces what changed.
We're not like most companies in this space. Our founders, Bo Rhyne and Andrew Garrett, started their careers on real projects, watching plan quality slip through the cracks, and built Current Sets to catch it before it turned into a change order. We're bootstrapped and profitable, reinvesting in the product as active users of it ourselves, which keeps our incentives pointed at making it work for the industry, not just for our own growth.
We'd rather ask why the industry keeps rewarding companies that take more from project teams every year, when late and over-budget projects still aren't getting rarer.