In our service business, a single change order avoided is usually enough to cover the cost of the review that caught it. Across our projects, we typically see 20x+ ROI on our services. Everything after the first catch is pure savings.
These default to what we typically see. Change any field and the ROI updates.
When a check lives in one reviewer's head, it only gets applied to the projects that reviewer happens to be staffed on, and only if they have time to go looking for it. Every other project ships uninspected, not because the standard didn't exist, but because nobody was positioned to catch it on that particular set.
That's the real cost of one-off, tribal-knowledge checks: the value of catching a problem depends entirely on who's in the room and how much time they have. A Screen doesn't have that problem. Once it's built, it runs on every project of that type, at the milestone you set, whether or not the person who wrote it is even still on your team.
A single change order avoided typically covers the full cost of the review that found it. Every other issue caught on that project is additional savings.
A Screen built once runs on every matching project going forward, and against your back catalog. The ROI on the tenth run looks nothing like the ROI on the first.
Standards stop being something one person has to remember to check. They're enforced automatically, every time, on every project they apply to.
Talk to us about the reviews you're running today, and where automated Screens would pay for themselves fastest.